How useful has an ideological critical approach been in understanding binary oppositions in the narratives of your chosen films?
Using critical ideology has helped to benefit the meaning
surrounding binary oppositions in fish tank. The binary opposites of wealth and
poverty are clearly reflected as part of an underlying meaning which Arnold is
expressing. During scenes following Mia such as the scene in which Mia attempts to free the horse, The use of the hand held unstable camera helps to build towards a
rough atmosphere. Furthermore, the use of blue unsaturated colours creates a
sense of coldness as the viewer is sutured into the narrative helps to make the
viewer feel uneasy and uncomfortable (this is a micro film element which Arnold
utilises throughout the film). Together these reflect the harsh reality of living
in council house areas in the UK. This is amplified through the use of warm colour
in Connors house which highlight the contrast between the lifestyle of the
middle class and the poor. Using ideological critical approaches such as the oedipal
trajectory, we can see Mia’s lust for her Father figure Connor. However, in
relation to the opposition in the class system we can see Connor taking
advantage of the attraction he understands Mia feels for him – using her for
his own sexual desires. From this we can understand what Arnold is trying to
express, how the middle class use the lower class for their own desires with
little care for the effects on who they take advantage of.
ReplyDeleteThere's too much going on here at once - you skip between Mia's house and Connor's house in the same paragraph, whilst also commenting on wealth, poverty, the oedipal trajectory and the class system ... this means there's not enough analysis on each of the components, because you're trying to do too much in one go. For example, "The use of the hand held unstable camera helps to build towards a rough atmosphere" - this is far too vague - you need to analyse SPECIFIC scenes, not deal in generalities.
Additionally, the element of the question focusing on binary oppositions is not, I feel, properly addressed here.
Mr Boon